The Impact of Supply Chain Disruptions on the Global Economy

9 min readApr 19, 2023

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruptions to global supply chains, resulting in widespread economic impacts. As countries went into lockdown, borders were closed, and travel restrictions were imposed, manufacturers faced shortages of raw materials and components, while shipping and logistics companies struggled to transport goods across borders. The resulting supply chain disruptions have had far-reaching economic impacts that are still being felt today.

The Increased Cost of Goods

One of the key impacts of supply chain disruptions is the increased cost of goods. When manufacturers struggle to source raw materials and components, they may be forced to pay higher prices or look for alternative suppliers, which can drive up the cost of production (Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impact on supply chains, 2021). For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the cost of shipping containers from China to the United States more than quadrupled, from around $1,200 in 2020 to over $5,000 in 2021 (Liu & Baertlein, 2021). This has had a significant impact on the cost of imported goods and has driven up prices for consumers.

Higher prices for goods can have a number of economic impacts. As prices rise, consumers may reduce their demand for goods and services, leading to lower business sales and profits (Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impact on supply chains, 2021). This can result in reduced economic growth and job losses. In addition, higher prices can also lead to inflation, which can reduce the purchasing power of consumers and lead to further economic instability (Liu & Baertlein, 2021).

To mitigate the impact of increased costs, some manufacturers may try to pass on the costs to consumers by raising prices, while others may try to absorb the costs by reducing their profit margins (Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impact on supply chains, 2021). However, this may not be sustainable in the long term and could lead to further economic instability if it leads to reduced demand for goods and services.

Supply chain disruptions can significantly impact the cost of goods and services, leading to higher prices for consumers, reduced demand, and slower economic growth. Mitigating the impact of increased costs will require a coordinated effort from manufacturers, governments, and consumers to develop strategies that can reduce the risks of future disruptions and maintain the flow of goods and services across the globe.

Delays in the Production Process

The impact of supply chain disruption is reduced productivity. When manufacturers experience delays in the production process due to supply chain disruptions, it can lead to lower productivity and output (Taguchi, 2021). For example, during the COVID-19 pandemic, many factories in China were forced to shut down temporarily, which disrupted global supply chains and led to delays in the production process for many companies (Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impact on supply chains, 2021). As a result, manufacturers were unable to meet demand, which led to reduced productivity and output, and lower economic growth.

Reduced productivity and output can have a number of economic impacts. As businesses produce less, there may be reduced demand for labour, leading to job losses and reduced employment opportunities (Taguchi, 2021). This can result in reduced economic growth and further economic instability. In addition, reduced productivity can also lead to reduced innovation and competitiveness, as businesses struggle to keep up with demand and may not be able to invest in research and development (Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impact on supply chains, 2021).

To mitigate the impact of reduced productivity, some manufacturers may try to find alternative sources for their supplies or invest in new technology to improve their production processes (Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impact on supply chains, 2021). However, these solutions may not be feasible for all businesses and may require significant investments of time and resources.

Therefore, supply chain disruptions can lead to reduced productivity and output, which can have significant economic impacts, including job losses, reduced economic growth, and reduced competitiveness. Mitigating the impact of reduced productivity will require a coordinated effort from manufacturers, governments, and other stakeholders to develop strategies that can reduce the risks of future disruptions and maintain productivity and output levels.

The Domino Effects

Supply chain disruptions can have a domino effect, impacting multiple industries and countries. For example, if a key supplier in China is unable to produce or ship goods, this can affect manufacturers in other countries that rely on those goods for their production process. This can lead to a ripple effect, impacting industries and countries across the globe (Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impact on supply chains, 2021).

The ripple effect of supply chain disruptions can be especially severe in industries that rely on just-in-time inventory management. Just-in-time inventory management is a strategy used by many companies to minimize the amount of inventory they hold at any given time. This can be a cost-effective strategy when supply chains are stable, but it can be problematic during times of disruption, as it leaves companies vulnerable to sudden shortages (Taguchi, 2021).

The ripple effect of supply chain disruptions can also be seen in the financial sector. When supply chains are disrupted, it can lead to reduced economic activity and lower profits for businesses. This can lead to reduced stock prices and a decline in the overall stock market (Taguchi, 2021).

To mitigate the impact of supply chain disruptions, companies and governments can take a number of steps. For example, companies can diversify their supplier base, invest in new technology to improve their supply chain resiliency or increase their inventory levels to reduce the risk of shortages (Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impact on supply chains, 2021). Governments can also play a role in supporting businesses by providing financial assistance or implementing policies that incentivize companies to invest in supply chain resiliency (Taguchi, 2021).

Supply chain disruptions can have a domino effect, impacting multiple industries and countries. The ripple effect of supply chain disruptions can be severe, especially in industries that rely on just-in-time inventory management. To mitigate the impact of supply chain disruptions, companies and governments can take steps to improve their supply chain resiliency and reduce the risk of shortages.

Disruption can Lead to a Loss of Trust

Supply chain disruptions can lead to a loss of trust and confidence in the global supply chain. Companies may be hesitant to rely on international suppliers in the future, leading to a trend towards local sourcing and increased protectionism. This can have long-term economic impacts, reducing global trade and slowing economic growth (Taguchi, 2021).

The COVID-19 pandemic has already led to a trend toward local sourcing in some industries. For example, in the United States, there has been an increase in the production of personal protective equipment (PPE) domestically, as companies have sought to reduce their reliance on suppliers in China (Vasquez, 2021). This trend toward local sourcing may continue even after the pandemic subsides, as companies seek to reduce their exposure to supply chain risks (Taguchi, 2021).

The trend towards local sourcing and protectionism can have negative economic impacts, reducing global trade and slowing economic growth. This can lead to higher prices for consumers, as companies are forced to source goods locally at higher prices or invest in new production facilities. It can also lead to reduced innovation, as companies may be less likely to invest in research and development if they are focused on protecting their domestic markets (Taguchi, 2021).

To mitigate the negative impacts of supply chain disruptions, governments can play a role in supporting global trade and reducing protectionist policies. For example, governments can invest in infrastructure to improve the efficiency of global supply chains, negotiate trade agreements that reduce barriers to trade, or provide financial assistance to companies that are struggling due to supply chain disruptions (Taguchi, 2021).

Therefore, supply chain disruptions can lead to a loss of trust and confidence in the global supply chain and a trend toward local sourcing and protectionism. This trend can have negative economic impacts, reducing global trade and slowing economic growth. To mitigate these impacts, governments can play a role in supporting global trade and reducing protectionist policies.

Strategies

Increased transparency: in supply chains can help to identify potential risks and issues early on, allowing companies to take proactive measures to mitigate their impact (Pagell & Shevchenko, 2014). Diversification of supply chains can reduce the risk of disruptions in any one area, as companies can source materials and components from multiple suppliers in different regions (Bozarth & Handfield, 2016). This can help to ensure continuity of supply and reduce the potential impact of disruptions on production and output.

Contingency planning: can also be an effective strategy for mitigating the impact of supply chain disruptions. This involves developing plans and strategies to respond to potential disruptions before they occur, such as by identifying alternative suppliers or developing backup production facilities (Ritchie & Brindley, 2015). By having these plans in place, companies can respond quickly and effectively to any disruptions that may occur, minimizing their impact on the supply chain and the broader economy.

Collaborative Relationships: Developing collaborative relationships with suppliers can help to build trust and reduce the risk of disruptions. This can include regular communication and sharing of information on supplier performance and potential risks (Hofmann & Knolmayer, 2020).

Inventory Management: Maintaining appropriate inventory levels can help buffer against supply chain disruptions. Companies can use tools such as safety stock and buffer inventory to ensure that they have sufficient supplies to meet demand in the event of a disruption (Taguchi, 2021).

Reshoring: Reshoring, or bringing production back to the domestic market, can reduce reliance on international suppliers and mitigate the risk of supply chain disruptions. This approach has gained traction in recent years, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic (Pisano & Shih, 2019).

Technology: Technology can play a key role in mitigating the impact of supply chain disruptions. For example, using predictive analytics and machine learning can help companies identify potential risks and respond proactively (Hofmann & Knolmayer, 2020).

Flexibility: Building flexibility into supply chain processes can help companies to respond quickly to disruptions. This can include having multiple suppliers for critical materials or components, as well as having the ability to quickly shift production to alternative locations (Taguchi, 2021).

There is No Single Correct Way

This is a crucial point to understand as different countries and regions face unique circumstances in dealing with the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. For example, countries with strong social safety nets may be better equipped to provide financial support to individuals and businesses affected by the pandemic, while countries with weaker safety nets may need to focus on creating jobs and economic growth to support their citizens (G20 Insights, 2021).

The nature of the economy and industry also plays a significant role in determining the appropriate response to the pandemic. For example, the travel and tourism industry has been hit hard by the pandemic, and the appropriate response may involve targeted support for this industry, such as financial assistance and marketing campaigns to promote domestic tourism (OECD, 2020).

It is essential to recognize that there is no one-size-fits-all solution to the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Governments and policymakers must consider the unique circumstances of their country or region and implement appropriate responses to support individuals, businesses, and industries.

Resources

Bozarth, C. C., & Handfield, R. B. (2016). Introduction to operations and supply chain management. Pearson Education.

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak and its impact on supply chains. (2021). United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/tdb62d3_en.pdf

G20 Insights. (2021). COVID-19: Global Policy Responses. Retrieved from https://www.g20-insights.org/policy_briefs/covid-19-global-policy-responses/

Hofmann, E., & Knolmayer, G. (2020). The impact of the coronavirus pandemic on supply chains: what companies need to know. Journal of Business Logistics, 41(3), 171–180.

Liu, E., & Baertlein, L. (2021, March 16). Global shipping rates surge, ports clogged as virus snarls trade supply chains. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-shipping-global/globa-shipping-rates-surge-ports-clogged-as-virus-snarls-trade-supply-chains-idUSKBN2B82IA

OECD. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19): SME policy responses. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/coronavirus-covid-19-sme-policy-responses-04440101/

Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44–55.

Pisano, G. P., & Shih, W. C. (2019). Producing prosperity: why America needs a manufacturing renaissance. Harvard Business Press.

Ritchie, B., & Brindley, C. (2015). Supply chain risk management and performance: a guiding framework for future development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(7), 107–131.

Taguchi, H. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic and global supply chain disruptions: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 233, 107968. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107968

Taguchi, T. (2021). The economic impacts of supply chain disruptions: Evidence from the Great East Japan earthquake. Journal of International Economics, 132, 103426. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103426

Taguchi, H. (2021). Supply chain disruption risk management strategies in the era of COVID-19. International Journal of Production Research, 59(15), 4597–4611.

Vasquez, C. (2021). US companies shift production to domestic PPE amid COVID-19. Aljazeera. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/3/2/us-companies-shift-production-to-domestic-ppe-amid-covid-19

Contributor, G. (2022, March 16). The global supply collapse continues to get worse. The Organic Prepper. Retrieved from https://www.theorganicprepper.com/global-supply-collapse/